It seems that there's a light at the end of the tunnel for the Syrian people that have been pressed against the wall by a violent proxy war launched against them by the Persian Gulf monarchies, Turkey, Israel, and you've guessed it right – the US. The transition to peace won't be quick and it won't be easy, but with a brilliant military operation being carried out by Russian warplanes in Syria along with the regular forces of the Syrian army, the US was certainly in no position to dictate its terms at the recent talks in Vienna. The only question is – where will ISIS go? With Iraq considering the possibility of demanding Russia's help, it seems there's no place to hide. Or is there?
Here Is the News
With the Russian military intervention in Syria becoming a PR nightmare for Washington, it was obvious that something was bound to happen. Just like it was in Ukraine in July 2014, when after a number of humiliating military defeats Kiev troops suffered in an attempt to suppress the breakaway Donetsk and Lugansk regions, a Malaysian Boeing MH17 was shot down from the Ukrainian sky just in time to make the news. The Western media was quick to push the blame on the Donetsk militia that somehow got their hands on the fairly advanced Buk anti-air system. Now the tragedy of Russian Airbus A321 that crashed in the Sinai Peninsula, claiming the lives of 224 people (including 25 children) came just in time to save Washington from the day-to-day humiliation that was brought upon it by Russia's success in Syria. A pattern can be clearly observed here, but this time around it will be an Airbus instead of a Boeing, and an S-200 instead of a Buk. Those aspects are important for the propaganda value, since a regular observer could have the impression that these two tragedies were otherwise somehow connected. Amazingly, Western journalists are not making any conclusions beforehand this time around, perhaps due to newly found decency.
Sisi in the Way of ISIS
Egypt has been the victim of foreign meddling for a while now, even despite the fact that it was formally a US ally in the region. After the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak who ruled Egypt for two decades in 2011, all power in the country was taken by the Muslim Brotherhood. As it was reported by Tony Cartalluci back in 2014:
The Muslim Brotherhood is a faux-theocratic sectarian extremist movement – a regional movement that transcends national borders. It is guilty sowing decades of violent discord not only in Egypt, but across the Arab World and it has remained a serious threat to secular, nationalist states from Algeria to Syria and back again. It is the factor of chaos of choice by the West and its regional collaborators, who generously fund it, arm it, and provide it with a steady stream of political recognition
Within a year those who supported the group as a new hope for Egypt, realized that the Muslim Brotherhood is only concerned with the well-being of the Persian Gulf monarchies, and, as the living conditions of Egyptians were deteriorating rapidly, they took to the streets to get rid of these foreign agents in their government. In July 2013, as the clashes grew more violent, the Egyptian army decided to side with the people of the country they swore to protect, with the Minister of Defense Abdel Fattah el-Sisi issuing an ultimatum demanding all political parties of the country obey the will of the protesters. As the then President Mohamed Morsi was arrested, Sisi had no choice but to take power until the elections. However, even when he became the legitimate president of Egypt his troubles were far from over. While the situation in the country remains pretty tense, Sisi has no choice but to try to walk a tightrope, balancing his policies in an attempt to seek cooperation with Russia without making the Persian Gulf monarchies and, ultimately, the US too angry about this fact. Egypt had to formally announce its support of the illegal Saudi intervention in Yemen, while making no real effort to fight the Houthi insurgency. It seems that in the eyes of Persian Gulf monarchs Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has overstayed his welcome, so ISIS militans will try to bring him down
As it was reported by the Guardian:
Ansar Beyt al-Maqdis (ABM), or Champions of Jerusalem, first emerged in 2011, amid a security vacuum caused by the fall of Hosni Mubarak. Based in the isolated northern Sinai desert, next to the Israeli border, ABM's operations expanded drastically after the Islamist ex-president Mohamed Morsi was overthrown in July 2013. But what began as a Sinai-based insurgency now seems to have spread to the Egyptian heartland, with ABM now capable of increasingly sophisticated attacks both in and outside the peninsula.
Then in 2014, the group was re-branded to fit the West's agenda, by becoming the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant - Sinai Province. Formally it was done by all members taking the oath of allegiance to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. No matter what it's called, it has organized a series of terrorist attacks over the years, with the taking down of a military helicopter with a MANPADS missile back in January 2014. This attack was carefully filmed and then uploaded to the Internet. Now the same group claims that it has brought down a Russian civilian jet over Sinai.
Russian military experts arriving at the crash site of Airbus A321 may have a sense of deja-vu. Back in October 2001, Ukraine shot down a Russian civilian jet over the Black Sea with an S-200 missile during military games as a result of criminal negligence. Kiev has denied its involvement in the tragedy for a long time, until the moment search teams discovered fragments of the plane that were covered in holes. The thing is that an S-200 does not hit a plane, instead it explodes while approaching it, hitting the aircraft with a cloud of shrapnel. At that point Ukraine was forced to admit that its military made a fatal mistake. Immediately after the crash of Airbus A321 Ansar Beyt al-Maqdis published a video, showing the jet being hit by an explosion directly underneath it, before it starts falling. With the group having a history of uploading credible footage and with the Islamic state's PR success being in decline, why would this group claim that they carried out a terrorist act, when they didn't. Why would they keep silent about an S-200 being used? Well, the anti-air system would have almost certainly have been brought from Libya, which had a total of 900 missile sites deployed across its territory by 2010, and is more than just a rocket. It's takes a total of five to six large trucks and a launch pad to deploy that system, and they must have been packed in a hurry after the attack to avoid a counter strike.
Russian officials remain silent about the cause of the crash. Once there's confirmation that a Russian civilian jet was brought down by an ISIS affiliated group, Ansar Beyt al-Maqdis is going to have all the media attention it could dream of, which would persuade ISIS troops in Syria to seek fortune in some other places, say Egypt, which may seriously aggravate the situation in this North African country. Yet, as US sanctions against Russia have intensified Sino-Russian rapprochement, this tragedy may play a pivotal role in facilitating Egypt's decision to join the ranks of Russia's allies. It's safe to assume that there's a plan being drafted somewhere in Moscow on the support that is to be provided to Egypt to prevent the destruction of yet another country.